Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.0311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Ecuador, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Ecuador stood at -0.0311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is up 78.9% on the previous year and up 76.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Ecuador peaked at 0.0173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2022 and was at its lowest, -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
Ecuador ranks 110th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.6312 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -37.0% |
| 2000 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +78.5% |
| 2002 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2003 | -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.3% |
| 2004 | -0.949 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.7% |
| 2005 | -0.9602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.2% |
| 2006 | -0.9417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.9% |
| 2007 | -0.8863 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.9% |
| 2008 | -0.5942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -33.0% |
| 2009 | -0.4001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.7% |
| 2010 | -0.3892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.7% |
| 2011 | -0.2252 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -42.2% |
| 2012 | -0.2161 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.0% |
| 2013 | -0.1268 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -41.4% |
| 2014 | -0.055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -56.6% |
| 2015 | -0.1305 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +137.3% |
| 2016 | -0.0853 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -34.7% |
| 2017 | -0.0766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.2% |
| 2018 | -0.1105 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +44.2% |
| 2019 | -0.0952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.8% |
| 2020 | -0.2887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +203.3% |
| 2021 | -0.0912 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -68.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -119.0% |
| 2023 | -0.1764 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1119.0% |
| 2024 | -0.1475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.3% |
| 2025 | -0.0311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -78.9% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's -0.0311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.4× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's -0.0311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (37 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | -1119.0% | 0.0173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1764 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2020 | -203.3% | -0.0952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.8162 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6312 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.8938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4001 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.1196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Ecuador?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Ecuador was -0.0311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2022.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Ecuador rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Ecuador ranks 110th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 76.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.