Ecuador vs Tonga: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Ecuador
-0.0311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Tonga
-0.059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Ecuador rank
110th
Tonga rank
112th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Tonga
-1-0.50199620102025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -0.0311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga, a difference of 0.0279 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tonga ahead.

Ecuador ranks 110th and Tonga ranks 112th of 206 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s -0.7886 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tonga
2010s -0.151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0322 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tonga
2020s -0.1196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0524 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Ecuador or Tonga?
Ecuador, at -0.0311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Ecuador and Tonga?
0.0279 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tonga?
22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Tonga rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Ecuador ranks 110th and Tonga ranks 112th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tonga: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ecuador/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ecuador/tonga/">Ecuador vs Tonga: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.