Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.7911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate in Burkina Faso, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Burkina Faso stood at -0.7911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.2% on the previous year and down 33.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, government effectiveness - governance estimate in Burkina Faso peaked at -0.4172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2018 and was at its lowest, -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2003.
That places Burkina Faso 165th out of 206 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Burkina Faso, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.8% |
| 2000 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2002 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.5% |
| 2003 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2004 | -0.7923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -29.9% |
| 2005 | -0.7437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.1% |
| 2006 | -0.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.3% |
| 2007 | -0.6955 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.2% |
| 2008 | -0.6577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.4% |
| 2009 | -0.6173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.2% |
| 2010 | -0.5232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.2% |
| 2011 | -0.5222 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2% |
| 2012 | -0.5784 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.8% |
| 2013 | -0.5757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2014 | -0.5417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.9% |
| 2015 | -0.5919 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.3% |
| 2016 | -0.4542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.3% |
| 2017 | -0.4446 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.1% |
| 2018 | -0.4172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.2% |
| 2019 | -0.6099 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +46.2% |
| 2020 | -0.6267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
| 2021 | -0.7014 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.9% |
| 2022 | -0.8324 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.7% |
| 2023 | -0.8258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2024 | -0.8808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.7% |
| 2025 | -0.7911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.2% |
Burkina Faso compared with similar countries
- Burkina Faso's -0.7911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for low income countries, which is -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 63% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Burkina Faso's -0.7911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 100% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.8464 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6173 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.5259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6099 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.7764 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Burkina Faso
- 162 Sao Tome and Principe -0.7661 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 163 Nepal -0.7696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 164 Guatemala -0.7759 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 166 Cameroon -0.795 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 167 Belarus -0.7986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 168 Mozambique -0.8084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Burkina Faso
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9232 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4137 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 33.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 45.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.25 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is government effectiveness - governance estimate in Burkina Faso?
- Government effectiveness - governance estimate in Burkina Faso was -0.7911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Burkina Faso?
- The highest recorded value was -0.4172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2018.
- What is the lowest government effectiveness - governance estimate recorded in Burkina Faso?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- How does Burkina Faso rank for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Burkina Faso ranks 165th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is government effectiveness - governance estimate rising or falling in Burkina Faso?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Burkina Faso data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.