Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Burkina Faso
-0.8749 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Nepal
-0.8845 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
168th
Nepal rank
169th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Nepal
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102024

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports -0.8749 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8845 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal, a difference of 0.0096 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Nepal ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 168th and Nepal ranks 169th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s -0.973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Nepal
2000s -0.8193 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2010s -0.5652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2020s -0.7976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Burkina Faso or Nepal?
Burkina Faso, at -0.8749 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8845 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Burkina Faso and Nepal?
0.0096 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Nepal?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Nepal rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Burkina Faso ranks 168th and Nepal ranks 169th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/burkina-faso/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/burkina-faso/nepal/">Burkina Faso vs Nepal: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.