Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square in Chile
Chile: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square was 114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in 2017. ▼ Falling
Latest (2017)
114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 4.2%
World rank
159th
of 168 countries
All-time high
502.24 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
All-time low
109.61 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
Years of data
57
1961–2017
Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square in Chile, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2017, foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square in Chile stood at 114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.2% on the previous year and down 6.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square in Chile peaked at 502.24 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in 1961 and was at its lowest, 109.61 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre, in 2016.
Chile ranks 159th of 168 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 57 years of available data.
Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square in Chile, year by year
| Year | constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 502.24 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 222.09 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -55.8% |
| 1963 | 159.73 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -28.1% |
| 1964 | 218.72 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1965 | 379.59 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +73.5% |
| 1966 | 351.85 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1967 | 192.46 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -45.3% |
| 1968 | 222.37 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1969 | 188.32 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 1970 | 301.07 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +59.9% |
| 1971 | 246.75 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 1972 | 184.91 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -25.1% |
| 1973 | 200.95 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1974 | 196.8 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1975 | 221.53 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1976 | 215.01 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1977 | 271.24 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 1978 | 235.44 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 1979 | 180.77 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1980 | 158.31 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 1981 | 147.33 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1982 | 139.32 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1983 | 163.2 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +17.1% |
| 1984 | 162.93 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1985 | 240.9 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +47.9% |
| 1986 | 167.82 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 1987 | 179.29 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1988 | 187.08 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1989 | 239.98 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 1990 | 299.26 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 1991 | 379.98 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +27.0% |
| 1992 | 304.88 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -19.8% |
| 1993 | 367.42 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 1994 | 293.81 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1995 | 245.51 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1996 | 230.68 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1997 | 221.01 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1998 | 194.7 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 1999 | 150.99 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 2000 | 150.43 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2001 | 172.57 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 2002 | 150.2 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2003 | 156.77 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2004 | 176.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 2005 | 252.26 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +43.1% |
| 2006 | 126.03 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2007 | 121.7 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2008 | 118.68 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2009 | 123.81 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2010 | 185.7 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 2011 | 123.53 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -33.5% |
| 2012 | 124.16 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2013 | 123.36 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2014 | 141.66 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2015 | 115.08 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -18.8% |
| 2016 | 109.61 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2017 | 114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 3,221 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre, 4% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
- Chile's 114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1,419 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre, 8% of the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 270.82 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 159.73 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 502.24 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 225.45 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 180.77 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 301.07 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 178.62 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 139.32 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 240.9 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 268.82 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 150.99 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 379.98 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 154.87 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 118.68 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 252.26 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 129.67 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 109.61 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 185.7 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 156 Botswana 150 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 157 Uruguay 142.03 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 158 North Korea 123.57 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 160 Algeria 109.1 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 161 United Arab Emirates 82.43 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 162 Brazil 63.88 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre compare
More reference data data for Chile
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square in Chile?
- Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square in Chile was 114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 502.24 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- What is the lowest foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 109.61 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- How does Chile rank for foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square?
- Chile ranks 159th out of 168 countries with data for 2017.
- Is foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans OECD (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.