Chile vs Uruguay: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square

Chile
114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Uruguay
142.03 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Chile rank
159th
Uruguay rank
157th

Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square over time

  • Chile
  • Uruguay
0100200300400500196119892017

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 142.03 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre against 114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 27.78 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 159th and Uruguay ranks 157th of 168 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 270.82 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 114.72 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 156.09 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 225.45 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 166.84 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 58.61 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 178.62 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 209.99 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 31.37 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 268.82 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 301.54 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 32.71 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 154.87 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 252.4 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 97.53 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 129.67 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 189.73 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 60.06 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square, Chile or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 142.03 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre against 114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2017.
What is the difference in foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square between Chile and Uruguay?
27.78 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square?
Chile ranks 159th and Uruguay ranks 157th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Uruguay: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-aid-received-as-grants-and-concessional-loans-per-square-kilometre/chile/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-aid-received-as-grants-and-concessional-loans-per-square-kilometre/chile/uruguay/">Chile vs Uruguay: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 8,567 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.