Brazil vs Chile: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square

Brazil
63.88 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Brazil rank
162nd
Chile rank
159th

Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square over time

  • Brazil
  • Chile
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre against 63.88 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 50.37 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.8 times Brazil's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 162nd and Chile ranks 159th of 168 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 72.07 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 270.82 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 198.75 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 30.21 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 225.45 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 195.24 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 33.8 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 178.62 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 144.82 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 42.81 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 268.82 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 226.01 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 49.05 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 154.87 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 105.82 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 66.96 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 129.67 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre 62.71 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square, Brazil or Chile?
Chile, at 114.25 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre against 63.88 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2017.
What is the difference in foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square between Brazil and Chile?
50.37 constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Chile?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Brazil and Chile rank globally for foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square?
Brazil ranks 162nd and Chile ranks 159th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Chile: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-aid-received-as-grants-and-concessional-loans-per-square-kilometre/brazil/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-aid-received-as-grants-and-concessional-loans-per-square-kilometre/brazil/chile/">Brazil vs Chile: Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans, per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2024 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 8,567 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign aid received as grants and concessional loans divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.