Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Peru

Peru: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 70.66 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
70.66
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
53rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
74.75
in 2009
All-time low
64.84
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Peru, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 64.82004: 64.82005: 64.82006: 71.52007: 71.52008: 71.52009: 74.82010: 74.82011: 74.82012: 70.52013: 70.72014: 70.72015: 70.72016: 70.72017: 70.72018: 70.72019: 70.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Peru is 70.66, measured in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Peru peaked at 74.75 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 64.84, in 2003.

Peru ranks 53rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Peru, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Peru, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 64.84
2004 64.84 +0.0%
2005 64.84 +0.0%
2006 71.48 +10.2%
2007 71.48 +0.0%
2008 71.48 +0.0%
2009 74.75 +4.6%
2010 74.75 +0.0%
2011 74.75 +0.0%
2012 70.49 -5.7%
2013 70.66 +0.2%
2014 70.66 +0.0%
2015 70.66 +0.0%
2016 70.66 +0.0%
2017 70.66 +0.0%
2018 70.66 +0.0%
2019 70.66 +0.0%

Peru compared with similar countries

  • Peru's 70.66 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 61.68, 1.1× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Peru's 70.66 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 56.97, 1.2× the median. (33 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 69.1 64.84 74.75 7
2010s 71.46 70.49 74.75 10

Countries ranked near Peru

  1. 50 Latvia 71.39 compare
  2. 51 Equatorial Guinea 70.9 compare
  3. 52 Antigua and Barbuda 70.82 compare
  4. 54 Cambodia 70.25 compare
  5. 54 Sweden 70.25 compare
  6. 56 Denmark 70.08 compare
  7. 56 Finland 70.08 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Peru

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Peru?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Peru was 70.66 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Peru?
The highest recorded value was 74.75 in 2009.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Peru?
The lowest recorded value was 64.84 in 2003.
How does Peru rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Peru ranks 53rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Peru?
Over the last ten years it is down 5.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Peru data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Peru. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/peru/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Peru</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.