Equatorial Guinea vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
70.9
in 2019
Peru
70.66
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
49th
Peru rank
51st
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Peru
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 70.9 against 70.66 in Peru, a difference of 0.24.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Peru ranks 51st of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.9 | 70.8 | 0.0983 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 70.9 | 71.46 | 0.5574 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Peru?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 70.9 against 70.66 in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Peru?
- 0.24, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Peru?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Peru ranks 51st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.