Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Angola
Angola: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 3.61 in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Angola, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Angola is 3.61, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is down 51.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Angola peaked at 26.97 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 3.61, in 2010.
Angola ranks 180th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Angola, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 26.97 | — |
| 2004 | 26.97 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 26.97 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 26.97 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 26.97 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 12.3 | -54.4% |
| 2009 | 7.38 | -40.0% |
| 2010 | 3.61 | -51.1% |
| 2011 | 3.61 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.61 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.61 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.61 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.61 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.61 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.61 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.61 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.61 | +0.0% |
Angola compared with similar countries
- Angola's 3.61 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 61.39, 6% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Angola's 3.61 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 61.89, 6% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.07 | 7.38 | 26.97 | 7 |
| 2010s | 3.61 | 3.61 | 3.61 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Angola
- 177 Sao Tome and Principe 12.7 compare
- 178 East Timor 4.51 compare
- 179 Colombia 4.26 compare
- 181 Liberia 3.28 compare
- 182 Sri Lanka 1.8 compare
- 183 Bangladesh 0
- 183 India 0
- 183 Afghanistan 0
- 183 Barbados 0
- 183 Greece 0 compare
- 183 Guatemala 0
- 183 Guinea-Bissau 0
- 183 Suriname 0
- 183 Trinidad and Tobago 0
More reference data data for Angola
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4536 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.163 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 20.43 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8877 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Angola?
- Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Angola was 3.61 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 26.97 in 2003.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.61 in 2010.
- How does Angola rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Angola ranks 180th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is down 51.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.