Angola vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

Angola
3.61
in 2019
East Timor
4.51
in 2019
Angola rank
177th
East Timor rank
175th

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Angola
  • East Timor
0102030200320112019

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 4.51 against 3.61 in Angola, a difference of 0.9.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.3 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 177th and East Timor ranks 175th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 21.26 0 21.26 Angola
2010s 3.61 4.51 0.9016 East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Angola or East Timor?
East Timor, at 4.51 against 3.61 in Angola as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Angola and East Timor?
0.9, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and East Timor?
16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
How do Angola and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Angola ranks 177th and East Timor ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.