Angola vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Angola
3.61
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
12.7
in 2019
Angola rank
177th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
174th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Angola
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 12.7 against 3.61 in Angola, a difference of 9.09.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 3.5 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 177th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.26 | 12.7 | 8.55 | Angola |
| 2010s | 3.61 | 16.89 | 13.28 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Angola or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 12.7 against 3.61 in Angola as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 9.09, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Angola and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Angola ranks 177th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.