How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Tanzania, United Republic of?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nepal vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

Nepal

33.33

in 2019

Tanzania, United Republic of

33.33

in 2019

Nepal rank

145th

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

145th

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

Nepal
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Nepal ranks 145th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th of 191 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Nepal or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Nepal, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Nepal and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Nepal and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?: Nepal ranks 145th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/nepal/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/nepal/tanzania/">Nepal vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.