Finland vs Indonesia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Finland
47.22
in 2019
Indonesia
49.39
in 2019
Finland rank
82nd
Indonesia rank
81st
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Finland
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 49.39 against 47.22 in Finland, a difference of 2.17.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 82nd and Indonesia ranks 81st of 191 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Finland or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 49.39 against 47.22 in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Finland and Indonesia?
- 2.17, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Indonesia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Indonesia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Finland ranks 82nd and Indonesia ranks 81st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.