Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Thailand

Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
81st
of 190 countries
All-time high
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2017
All-time low
7.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Thailand, 2015–2019

024682015201720192015: 7.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 7.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 8.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 8.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 8.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Thailand is 8.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 13.3% over five years.

That places Thailand 81st out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Thailand

  1. 80 Indonesia 8.89 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 81 Finland 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 81 Guinea-Bissau 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 81 Ireland 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 81 Lesotho 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 81 Luxembourg 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 81 Mozambique 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 81 Papua New Guinea 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  9. 81 South Africa 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  10. 81 Sri Lanka 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  11. 81 Uganda 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  12. 81 Uzbekistan 8.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Thailand

All data for Thailand →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Thailand?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Thailand was 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Thailand?
The highest recorded value was 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2017.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Thailand?
The lowest recorded value was 7.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Thailand rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Thailand ranks 81st out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Thailand data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Thailand. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/thailand/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Thailand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.