Thailand vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Thailand
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Uzbekistan
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Thailand rank
82nd
Uzbekistan rank
82nd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Thailand
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Thailand ahead.
Thailand ranks 82nd and Uzbekistan ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Thailand or Uzbekistan?
- Thailand, at 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Thailand and Uzbekistan?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Uzbekistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Thailand and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Thailand ranks 82nd and Uzbekistan ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.