Sri Lanka vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Sri Lanka
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Thailand
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sri Lanka rank
82nd
Thailand rank
82nd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Sri Lanka
- Thailand
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Thailand, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 82nd and Thailand ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Sri Lanka or Thailand?
- Sri Lanka, at 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Sri Lanka and Thailand?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Sri Lanka and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Sri Lanka ranks 82nd and Thailand ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.