Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Pakistan
Pakistan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures was 46 number in 2014. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Pakistan, 2003–2014
Source: World Bank. Measured in number.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: procedures in Pakistan is 46 number, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures in Pakistan peaked at 46 number in 2003 and was at its lowest, 46 number, in 2003.
That places Pakistan 19th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top 10%.
Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 46 number | — |
| 2004 | 46 number | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 46 number | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 46 number | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 46 number | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 46 number | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 46 number | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 46 number | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 46 number | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 46 number | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 46 number | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 46 number | +0.0% |
Pakistan compared with similar countries
- Pakistan's 46 number is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 40.61 number, 1.1× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Pakistan's 46 number is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 43 number, 1.1× the median. (21 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46 number | 46 number | 46 number | 7 |
| 2010s | 46 number | 46 number | 46 number | 5 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
- 16 Bhutan 47 number compare
- 16 Brunei 47 number compare
- 16 Honduras 47 number compare
- 19 India 46 number compare
- 19 Afghanistan 46 number compare
- 19 Angola 46 number compare
- 19 Dominica 46 number compare
- 19 Grenada 46 number compare
- 19 Mauritania 46 number compare
- 19 Saint Kitts and Nevis 46 number compare
- 19 Saint Lucia 46 number compare
More reference data data for Pakistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 6.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 20.96 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 61.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 61.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 20.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 91.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 260 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 10.79 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: procedures in Pakistan?
- Enforcing contracts: procedures in Pakistan was 46 number in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 46 number in 2003.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 46 number in 2003.
- How does Pakistan rank for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Pakistan ranks 19th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is enforcing contracts: procedures rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.