Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures was 46 number in 2014. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Afghanistan, 2004–2014
Source: World Bank. Measured in number.
Analysis
In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures in Afghanistan stood at 46 number. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of down 2.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures in Afghanistan peaked at 47 number in 2004 and was at its lowest, 46 number, in 2013.
Afghanistan ranks 19th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Afghanistan, year by year
| Year | number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 47 number | — |
| 2005 | 47 number | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 47 number | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 47 number | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 47 number | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 47 number | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 47 number | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 47 number | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 47 number | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 46 number | -2.1% |
| 2014 | 46 number | +0.0% |
Afghanistan compared with similar countries
- Afghanistan's 46 number is above the median for low income countries, which is 39 number, 1.2× the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Afghanistan's 46 number is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 43 number, 1.1× the median. (21 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47 number | 47 number | 47 number | 6 |
| 2010s | 46.6 number | 46 number | 47 number | 5 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
- 16 Bhutan 47 number compare
- 16 Brunei 47 number compare
- 16 Honduras 47 number compare
- 19 India 46 number compare
- 19 Pakistan 46 number compare
- 19 Angola 46 number compare
- 19 Dominica 46 number compare
- 19 Grenada 46 number compare
- 19 Mauritania 46 number compare
- 19 Saint Kitts and Nevis 46 number compare
- 19 Saint Lucia 46 number compare
More reference data data for Afghanistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8991 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4362 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.847 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 26.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.38 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: procedures in Afghanistan?
- Enforcing contracts: procedures in Afghanistan was 46 number in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 47 number in 2004.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 46 number in 2013.
- How does Afghanistan rank for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Afghanistan ranks 19th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is enforcing contracts: procedures rising or falling in Afghanistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.