Afghanistan vs Pakistan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Afghanistan
- Pakistan
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 46 number against 46 number in Pakistan, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 17th and Pakistan ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47 number | 46 number | 1 number | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 46.6 number | 46 number | 0.6 number | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Afghanistan or Pakistan?
- Afghanistan, at 46 number against 46 number in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Afghanistan and Pakistan?
- 0 number, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Pakistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Afghanistan and Pakistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Afghanistan ranks 17th and Pakistan ranks 17th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.