Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Kiribati

Kiribati: Enforcing contracts: Procedures was 32 number in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
32 number
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
149th
of 184 countries
All-time high
32 number
in 2003
All-time low
32 number
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Kiribati, 2003–2014

01020302003200820142003: 32 number2004: 32 number2005: 32 number2006: 32 number2007: 32 number2008: 32 number2009: 32 number2010: 32 number2011: 32 number2012: 32 number2013: 32 number2014: 32 number

Source: World Bank. Measured in number.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures in Kiribati stood at 32 number. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures in Kiribati peaked at 32 number in 2003 and was at its lowest, 32 number, in 2003.

Kiribati ranks 149th of 184 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Kiribati, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) in Kiribati, 2003 to 2014.
Year number Change
2003 32 number
2004 32 number +0.0%
2005 32 number +0.0%
2006 32 number +0.0%
2007 32 number +0.0%
2008 32 number +0.0%
2009 32 number +0.0%
2010 32 number +0.0%
2011 32 number +0.0%
2012 32 number +0.0%
2013 32 number +0.0%
2014 32 number +0.0%

Kiribati compared with similar countries

  • Kiribati's 32 number is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 40.61 number, 79% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
  • Kiribati's 32 number is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 36 number, 89% of the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 32 number 32 number 32 number 7
2010s 32 number 32 number 32 number 5

Countries ranked near Kiribati

  1. 149 Japan 32 number compare
  2. 149 Cote d'Ivoire 32 number compare
  3. 149 South Korea 32 number compare
  4. 149 Mongolia 32 number compare
  5. 149 Panama 32 number compare
  6. 149 Slovenia 32 number compare
  7. 149 Switzerland 32 number compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Kiribati

All data for Kiribati →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures in Kiribati?
Enforcing contracts: procedures in Kiribati was 32 number in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures recorded in Kiribati?
The highest recorded value was 32 number in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures recorded in Kiribati?
The lowest recorded value was 32 number in 2003.
How does Kiribati rank for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Kiribati ranks 149th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures rising or falling in Kiribati?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Kiribati data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Kiribati. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number/kiribati/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Kiribati</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.