Kiribati vs South Korea: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Kiribati
- South Korea
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 32 number against 32 number in South Korea, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 146th and South Korea ranks 146th of 181 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32 number | 34 number | 2 number | South Korea |
| 2010s | 32 number | 32.4 number | 0.4 number | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Kiribati or South Korea?
- Kiribati, at 32 number against 32 number in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Kiribati and South Korea?
- 0 number, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and South Korea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Kiribati and South Korea rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Kiribati ranks 146th and South Korea ranks 146th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.