Japan vs Kiribati: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Japan
32 number
in 2014
Kiribati
32 number
in 2014
Japan rank
146th
Kiribati rank
146th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Japan
- Kiribati
How they compare
Japan currently reports 32 number against 32 number in Kiribati, a difference of 0 number.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 146th and Kiribati ranks 146th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32 number | 32 number | 0 number | — |
| 2010s | 32 number | 32 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Japan or Kiribati?
- Japan, at 32 number against 32 number in Kiribati as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Japan and Kiribati?
- 0 number, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Kiribati?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Japan and Kiribati rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Japan ranks 146th and Kiribati ranks 146th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.