Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Montenegro

Montenegro: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 12.5 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
12.5
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
172nd
of 184 countries
All-time high
12.5
in 2006
All-time low
12.5
in 2006
Years of data
9
2006–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Montenegro, 2006–2014

02.557.51012.52006201020142006: 12.52007: 12.52008: 12.52009: 12.52010: 12.52011: 12.52012: 12.52013: 12.52014: 12.5

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Montenegro recorded 12.5 for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Montenegro peaked at 12.5 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 12.5, in 2006.

That places Montenegro 172nd out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Montenegro, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Montenegro, 2006 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2006 12.5
2007 12.5 +0.0%
2008 12.5 +0.0%
2009 12.5 +0.0%
2010 12.5 +0.0%
2011 12.5 +0.0%
2012 12.5 +0.0%
2013 12.5 +0.0%
2014 12.5 +0.0%

Montenegro compared with similar countries

  • Montenegro's 12.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 50, 25% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Montenegro's 12.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 59.38, 21% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 12.5 12.5 12.5 4
2010s 12.5 12.5 12.5 5

Countries ranked near Montenegro

  1. 170 Bahamas 15.62 compare
  2. 170 Bahrain 15.62 compare
  3. 172 Armenia 12.5 compare
  4. 172 Guinea 12.5 compare
  5. 172 United Arab Emirates 12.5 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Montenegro

All data for Montenegro →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Montenegro?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Montenegro was 12.5 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Montenegro?
The highest recorded value was 12.5 in 2006.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Montenegro?
The lowest recorded value was 12.5 in 2006.
How does Montenegro rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Montenegro ranks 172nd out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Montenegro?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Montenegro data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Montenegro. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/montenegro/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Montenegro</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.