Bahrain vs Montenegro: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Bahrain
15.62
in 2014
Montenegro
12.5
in 2014
Bahrain rank
169th
Montenegro rank
171st

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Bahrain
  • Montenegro
051015200620102014

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 15.62 against 12.5 in Montenegro, a difference of 3.12.

That makes Bahrain's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Bahrain has been ahead every year.

Bahrain ranks 169th and Montenegro ranks 171st of 181 countries.

Bahrain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 15.62 12.5 3.12 Bahrain
2010s 15.62 12.5 3.12 Bahrain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Bahrain or Montenegro?
Bahrain, at 15.62 against 12.5 in Montenegro as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Bahrain and Montenegro?
3.12, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Montenegro?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Bahrain and Montenegro rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Bahrain ranks 169th and Montenegro ranks 171st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.