Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guinea

Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 12.5 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
12.5
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
172nd
of 184 countries
All-time high
12.5
in 2003
All-time low
12.5
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guinea, 2003–2014

02.557.51012.52003200820142003: 12.52004: 12.52005: 12.52006: 12.52007: 12.52008: 12.52009: 12.52010: 12.52011: 12.52012: 12.52013: 12.52014: 12.5

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Guinea recorded 12.5 for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guinea peaked at 12.5 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 12.5, in 2003.

Guinea ranks 172nd of 184 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guinea, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guinea, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 12.5
2004 12.5 +0.0%
2005 12.5 +0.0%
2006 12.5 +0.0%
2007 12.5 +0.0%
2008 12.5 +0.0%
2009 12.5 +0.0%
2010 12.5 +0.0%
2011 12.5 +0.0%
2012 12.5 +0.0%
2013 12.5 +0.0%
2014 12.5 +0.0%

Guinea compared with similar countries

  • Guinea's 12.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 38.7, 32% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
  • Guinea's 12.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 42.19, 30% of the median. (46 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 12.5 12.5 12.5 7
2010s 12.5 12.5 12.5 5

Countries ranked near Guinea

  1. 170 Bahamas 15.62 compare
  2. 170 Bahrain 15.62 compare
  3. 172 Armenia 12.5 compare
  4. 172 Montenegro 12.5 compare
  5. 172 United Arab Emirates 12.5 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Guinea

All data for Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guinea?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Guinea was 12.5 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 12.5 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 12.5 in 2003.
How does Guinea rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Guinea ranks 172nd out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Guinea data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guinea. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/guinea/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.