Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Japan

Japan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 65.62 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
65.62
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
29th
of 184 countries
All-time high
65.62
in 2003
All-time low
65.62
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Japan, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 65.62004: 65.62005: 65.62006: 65.62007: 65.62008: 65.62009: 65.62010: 65.62011: 65.62012: 65.62013: 65.62014: 65.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Japan recorded 65.62 for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Japan peaked at 65.62 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 65.62, in 2003.

Japan ranks 29th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Japan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Japan, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 65.62
2004 65.62 +0.0%
2005 65.62 +0.0%
2006 65.62 +0.0%
2007 65.62 +0.0%
2008 65.62 +0.0%
2009 65.62 +0.0%
2010 65.62 +0.0%
2011 65.62 +0.0%
2012 65.62 +0.0%
2013 65.62 +0.0%
2014 65.62 +0.0%

Japan compared with similar countries

  • Japan's 65.62 is above the median for high income countries, which is 59.38, 1.1× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Japan's 65.62 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 53.12, 1.2× the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 65.62 65.62 65.62 7
2010s 65.62 65.62 65.62 5

Countries ranked near Japan

  1. 29 Cote d'Ivoire 65.62 compare
  2. 29 Kiribati 65.62 compare
  3. 29 South Korea 65.62 compare
  4. 29 Mongolia 65.62 compare
  5. 29 Panama 65.62 compare
  6. 29 Slovenia 65.62 compare
  7. 29 Switzerland 65.62 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Japan

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Japan?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Japan was 65.62 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Japan?
The highest recorded value was 65.62 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Japan?
The lowest recorded value was 65.62 in 2003.
How does Japan rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Japan ranks 29th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Japan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Japan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Japan. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/japan/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Japan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.