Cote d'Ivoire vs Japan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Cote d'Ivoire
65.62
in 2014
Japan
65.62
in 2014
Cote d'Ivoire rank
29th
Japan rank
29th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Japan
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 65.62 against 65.62 in Japan, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 29th and Japan ranks 29th of 181 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 62.5 65.62 3.12 Japan
2010s 63.75 65.62 1.88 Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Cote d'Ivoire or Japan?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 65.62 against 65.62 in Japan as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Cote d'Ivoire and Japan?
0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Japan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Japan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 29th and Japan ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.