Japan vs South Korea: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Japan
65.62
in 2014
South Korea
65.62
in 2014
Japan rank
29th
South Korea rank
29th
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Japan
- South Korea
How they compare
Japan currently reports 65.62 against 65.62 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 29th and South Korea ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.62 | 59.38 | 6.25 | Japan |
| 2010s | 65.62 | 64.38 | 1.25 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Japan or South Korea?
- Japan, at 65.62 against 65.62 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Japan and South Korea?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and South Korea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Japan and South Korea rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
- Japan ranks 29th and South Korea ranks 29th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.