Azerbaijan vs Costa Rica: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Azerbaijan
40.62
in 2014
Costa Rica
40.62
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
109th
Costa Rica rank
109th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Costa Rica
010203040200320082014

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 40.62 against 40.62 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 109th and Costa Rica ranks 109th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Costa Rica Difference Ahead
2000s 40.62 40.62 0
2010s 40.62 40.62 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Azerbaijan or Costa Rica?
Azerbaijan, at 40.62 against 40.62 in Costa Rica as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Azerbaijan and Costa Rica?
0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Costa Rica?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Azerbaijan and Costa Rica rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Azerbaijan ranks 109th and Costa Rica ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.