Belarus vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score

Belarus
75
in 2014
South Africa
75
in 2014
Belarus rank
14th
South Africa rank
14th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Belarus
  • South Africa
020406080200320082014

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 75 against 75 in South Africa, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 14th of 181 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus South Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 78.12 71.88 6.25 Belarus
2010s 75.62 75 0.625 Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score, Belarus or South Africa?
Belarus, at 75 against 75 in South Africa as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score between Belarus and South Africa?
0, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Belarus ranks 14th and South Africa ranks 14th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.