Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 63.66 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
63.66
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
62nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
63.66
in 2015
All-time low
63.66
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, 2015–2019

02040602015201720192015: 63.72016: 63.72017: 63.72018: 63.72019: 63.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines stood at 63.66. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 62nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 63.66 —
2016 63.66 +0.0%
2017 63.66 +0.0%
2018 63.66 +0.0%
2019 63.66 +0.0%

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines compared with similar countries

  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's 63.66 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 58.01, 1.1× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's 63.66 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 57.51, 1.1× the median. (33 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

  1. 59 Brazil 64.08 compare
  2. 60 Bahrain 63.79 compare
  3. 61 Morocco 63.7 compare
  4. 63 Moldova 63.65 compare
  5. 64 Ukraine 63.59 compare
  6. 65 Namibia 63.44 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

All data for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines was 63.66 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
The highest recorded value was 63.66 in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
The lowest recorded value was 63.66 in 2015.
How does Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 62nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Saint Vincent and the Grenadines data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db17-20-methodology-score/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db17-20-methodology-score/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.