Namibia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Namibia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 63.66 against 63.44 in Namibia, a difference of 0.22.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 63rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 60th of 188 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Namibia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 63.66 against 63.44 in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Namibia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.22, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Namibia ranks 63rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 60th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.