Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo

Democratic Republic of Congo: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 33.28 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
33.28
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
179th
of 191 countries
All-time high
33.28
in 2018
All-time low
32.35
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2019

01020302015201720192015: 32.42016: 32.42017: 32.42018: 33.32019: 33.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Democratic Republic of Congo recorded 33.28 for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.9% over five years.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 179th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 32.35 —
2016 32.35 +0.0%
2017 32.35 +0.0%
2018 33.28 +2.9%
2019 33.28 +0.0%

Democratic Republic of Congo compared with similar countries

  • Democratic Republic of Congo's 33.28 is below the median for low income countries, which is 47.62, 70% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Democratic Republic of Congo's 33.28 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 50.71, 66% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo

  1. 176 Liberia 35.23 compare
  2. 177 Guatemala 34.55 compare
  3. 178 Colombia 34.29 compare
  4. 180 Comoros 32.97 compare
  5. 181 Gabon 32.84 compare
  6. 182 Afghanistan 31.76 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Democratic Republic of Congo

All data for Democratic Republic of Congo →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Democratic Republic of Congo?
Enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Democratic Republic of Congo was 33.28 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
The highest recorded value was 33.28 in 2018.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
The lowest recorded value was 32.35 in 2015.
How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 179th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db17-20-methodology-score/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db17-20-methodology-score/congo-dem-rep/">Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.