Statizoid

Comoros vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Comoros
32.97
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo
33.28
in 2019
Comoros rank
177th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
176th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
0102030201520172019

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 33.28 against 32.97 in Comoros, a difference of 0.31.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of Congo has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 177th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 176th of 188 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Comoros or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 33.28 against 32.97 in Comoros as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Comoros and Democratic Republic of Congo?
0.31, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Democratic Republic of Congo?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Comoros and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Comoros ranks 177th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 176th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.