Democratic Republic of Congo vs Gabon: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Democratic Republic of Congo
33.28
in 2019
Gabon
32.84
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
176th
Gabon rank
178th

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Gabon
010203040201520172019

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 33.28 against 32.84 in Gabon, a difference of 0.44.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Gabon ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 176th and Gabon ranks 178th of 188 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Gabon?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 33.28 against 32.84 in Gabon as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Gabon?
0.44, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Gabon?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Gabon rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 176th and Gabon ranks 178th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.