Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 56.46 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Saudi Arabia, 2003–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Saudi Arabia is 56.46, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 3.0% on the previous year and up 7.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Saudi Arabia peaked at 56.46 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 52.74, in 2003.
That places Saudi Arabia 95th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Saudi Arabia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 52.74 | — |
| 2004 | 52.74 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 52.74 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 52.74 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 52.74 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 52.74 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 52.74 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 52.74 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 52.74 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 54.82 | +4.0% |
| 2013 | 54.82 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 56.46 | +3.0% |
Saudi Arabia compared with similar countries
- Saudi Arabia's 56.46 is below the median for high income countries, which is 64.27, 88% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Saudi Arabia's 56.46 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 52.61, 1.1× the median. (21 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.74 | 52.74 | 52.74 | 7 |
| 2010s | 54.32 | 52.74 | 56.46 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Saudi Arabia
- 92 Bosnia and Herzegovina 56.89 compare
- 93 Kyrgyzstan 56.78 compare
- 94 Qatar 56.73 compare
- 96 Nigeria 56.31 compare
- 97 Antigua and Barbuda 56.19 compare
- 98 Puerto Rico 56.03 compare
More reference data data for Saudi Arabia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1847 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1771 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6194 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2207 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 10.64 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9641 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Saudi Arabia?
- Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Saudi Arabia was 56.46 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Saudi Arabia?
- The highest recorded value was 56.46 in 2014.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Saudi Arabia?
- The lowest recorded value was 52.74 in 2003.
- How does Saudi Arabia rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 95th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Saudi Arabia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Saudi Arabia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.