Puerto Rico vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Puerto Rico
56.03
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
56.46
in 2014
Puerto Rico rank
98th
Saudi Arabia rank
95th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Saudi Arabia
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 56.46 against 56.03 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.43.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 98th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 56.3 52.74 3.56 Puerto Rico
2010s 56.14 54.32 1.82 Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Puerto Rico or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 56.46 against 56.03 in Puerto Rico as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Puerto Rico and Saudi Arabia?
0.43, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Saudi Arabia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do Puerto Rico and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Puerto Rico ranks 98th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.