Nigeria vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Nigeria
56.31
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
56.46
in 2014
Nigeria rank
96th
Saudi Arabia rank
95th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Nigeria
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 56.46 against 56.31 in Nigeria, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Nigeria ranks 96th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 184 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.02 | 52.74 | 18.71 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 45.13 | 54.32 | 9.19 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Nigeria or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 56.46 against 56.31 in Nigeria as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Nigeria and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.15, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Saudi Arabia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Nigeria and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Nigeria ranks 96th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.