Central African Republic vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Suriname
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 31.62 against 28.84 in Suriname, a difference of 2.78.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 178th and Suriname ranks 181st of 184 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.62 | 28.84 | 2.79 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 31.62 | 28.84 | 2.79 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or Suriname?
- Central African Republic, at 31.62 against 28.84 in Suriname as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and Suriname?
- 2.78, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Central African Republic and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 178th and Suriname ranks 181st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.