Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Montenegro
Montenegro: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Montenegro, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Montenegro is 5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
Montenegro ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Montenegro, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Montenegro compared with similar countries
- Montenegro's 5 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 1.4× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Montenegro's 5 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 1.4× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Montenegro
- 1 China 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Croatia 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Mauritius 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Morocco 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 North Macedonia 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Poland 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Romania 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Serbia 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Ukraine 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Montenegro
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0413 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0412 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.095 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0009 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.095 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1384 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1046 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1738 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4689 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0049 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Montenegro?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Montenegro was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Montenegro?
- The highest recorded value was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Montenegro?
- The lowest recorded value was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Montenegro rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Montenegro ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Montenegro data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.