Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mauritius
Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mauritius, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
Mauritius recorded 5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
That places Mauritius 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Mauritius compared with similar countries
- Mauritius's 5 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 DB17-20 methodology, 1.4× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Mauritius's 5 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 DB17-20 methodology, 1.7× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Mauritius
- 1 China 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Croatia 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Montenegro 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Morocco 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 North Macedonia 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Poland 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Romania 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Serbia 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 Ukraine 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Mauritius
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0409 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0002 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0513 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0343 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2885 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0008 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mauritius?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in Mauritius was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Mauritius rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Mauritius ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.