Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Solomon Islands
Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Solomon Islands, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Solomon Islands stood at 2 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
Solomon Islands ranks 35th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Solomon Islands, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Solomon Islands compared with similar countries
- Solomon Islands's 2 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1 DB17-20 methodology, 2.0× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Solomon Islands
- 35 India 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Argentina 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Armenia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Austria 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Bulgaria 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Chile 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Croatia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 France 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Greece 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Iceland 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Latvia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Moldova 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Namibia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Netherlands 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 North Macedonia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Romania 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Saudi Arabia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Sweden 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Ukraine 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Uzbekistan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Solomon Islands
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0075 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0154 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0002 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0154 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0259 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0427 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0894 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0009 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Solomon Islands?
- Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Solomon Islands was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Solomon Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Solomon Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Solomon Islands rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Solomon Islands ranks 35th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Solomon Islands data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.