Namibia vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Namibia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 2 DB17-20 methodology against 2 DB17-20 methodology in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 35th and Solomon Islands ranks 35th of 188 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Namibia or Solomon Islands?
- Namibia, at 2 DB17-20 methodology against 2 DB17-20 methodology in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Namibia and Solomon Islands?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Solomon Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Namibia ranks 35th and Solomon Islands ranks 35th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.