Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in India
India: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in India, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in India is 2 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
India ranks 35th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in India, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
India compared with similar countries
- India's 2 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for South Asia, which is 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, 4.0× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near India
- 35 Argentina 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Armenia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Austria 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Bulgaria 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Chile 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Croatia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 France 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Greece 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Iceland 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Latvia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Moldova 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Namibia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Netherlands 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 North Macedonia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Romania 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Saudi Arabia 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Solomon Islands 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Sweden 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Ukraine 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 35 Uzbekistan 2 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for India
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 20.88 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 68.88 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 246.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 15.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 246.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 70.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 19.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 309.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1,063 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 85.03 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in India?
- Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in India was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in India?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in India?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does India rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- India ranks 35th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this India data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.