Afghanistan vs Republic of Moldova: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Afghanistan
67.5%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
67.9%
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
104th
Republic of Moldova rank
101st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 67.9% against 67.5% in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 104th and Republic of Moldova ranks 101st of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.5% | 80.6% | 13.1% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 67.5% | 68.8% | 1.3% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Afghanistan or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 67.9% against 67.5% in Afghanistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Afghanistan and Republic of Moldova?
- 0.4%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Republic of Moldova?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Republic of Moldova rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 104th and Republic of Moldova ranks 101st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.