Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Mali

Mali: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 41.6% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
41.6%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
171st
of 191 countries
All-time high
41.6%
in 2003
All-time low
41.6%
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Mali, 2003–2019

0102030402003201120192003: 41.62004: 41.62005: 41.62006: 41.62007: 41.62008: 41.62009: 41.62010: 41.62011: 41.62012: 41.62013: 41.62014: 41.62015: 41.62016: 41.62017: 41.62018: 41.62019: 41.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Mali recorded 41.6% for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Mali peaked at 41.6% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 41.6%, in 2003.

That places Mali 171st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Mali, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Mali, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 41.6% —
2004 41.6% +0.0%
2005 41.6% +0.0%
2006 41.6% +0.0%
2007 41.6% +0.0%
2008 41.6% +0.0%
2009 41.6% +0.0%
2010 41.6% +0.0%
2011 41.6% +0.0%
2012 41.6% +0.0%
2013 41.6% +0.0%
2014 41.6% +0.0%
2015 41.6% +0.0%
2016 41.6% +0.0%
2017 41.6% +0.0%
2018 41.6% +0.0%
2019 41.6% +0.0%

Mali compared with similar countries

  • Mali's 41.6% is below the median for low income countries, which is 61.5%, 68% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Mali's 41.6% is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 56.5%, 74% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 41.6% 41.6% 41.6% 7
2010s 41.6% 41.6% 41.6% 10

Countries ranked near Mali

  1. 168 Togo 46.7% compare
  2. 169 Jamaica 43.6% compare
  3. 170 Myanmar 42.2% compare
  4. 172 Niger 40.9% compare
  5. 173 Congo 40.3% compare
  6. 174 Mozambique 40.2% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Mali

All data for Mali →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Mali?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Mali was 41.6% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Mali?
The highest recorded value was 41.6% in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Mali?
The lowest recorded value was 41.6% in 2003.
How does Mali rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Mali ranks 171st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Mali?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mali data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Mali. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/mali/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Mali</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.