Mali vs Mozambique: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Mali
41.6%
in 2019
Mozambique
40.2%
in 2019
Mali rank
170th
Mozambique rank
173rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Mali
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mali currently reports 41.6% against 40.2% in Mozambique, a difference of 1.4%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.
Mali ranks 170th and Mozambique ranks 173rd of 190 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.6% | 40.2% | 1.5% | Mali |
| 2010s | 41.6% | 40.2% | 1.5% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Mali or Mozambique?
- Mali, at 41.6% against 40.2% in Mozambique as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Mali and Mozambique?
- 1.4%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Mozambique?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mali and Mozambique rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Mali ranks 170th and Mozambique ranks 173rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.