Jamaica vs Mali: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Jamaica
43.6%
in 2019
Mali
41.6%
in 2019
Jamaica rank
169th
Mali rank
171st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Jamaica
- Mali
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 43.6% against 41.6% in Mali, a difference of 2.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 169th and Mali ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.9% | 41.6% | 2.2% | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 43.8% | 41.6% | 2.2% | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Jamaica or Mali?
- Jamaica, at 43.6% against 41.6% in Mali as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Jamaica and Mali?
- 2.0%, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mali?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Mali rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Jamaica ranks 169th and Mali ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.