Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Iran

Iran: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 78.4% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
78.4%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
32nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
81.0%
in 2003
All-time low
78.4%
in 2016
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Iran, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 812004: 812005: 812006: 812007: 812008: 812009: 812010: 812011: 812012: 812013: 812014: 812015: 812016: 78.42017: 78.42018: 78.42019: 78.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Iran is 78.4%, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is down 3.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Iran peaked at 81.0% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 78.4%, in 2016.

Iran ranks 32nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Iran, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Iran, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 81.0% —
2004 81.0% +0.0%
2005 81.0% +0.0%
2006 81.0% +0.0%
2007 81.0% +0.0%
2008 81.0% +0.0%
2009 81.0% +0.0%
2010 81.0% +0.0%
2011 81.0% +0.0%
2012 81.0% +0.0%
2013 81.0% +0.0%
2014 81.0% +0.0%
2015 81.0% +0.0%
2016 78.4% -3.2%
2017 78.4% +0.0%
2018 78.4% +0.0%
2019 78.4% +0.0%

Iran compared with similar countries

  • Iran's 78.4% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 67.7%, 1.2× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Iran's 78.4% is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 70.6%, 1.1× the median. (23 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 81.0% 81.0% 81.0% 7
2010s 80.0% 78.4% 81.0% 10

Countries ranked near Iran

  1. 30 Bulgaria 79.2% compare
  2. 30 Kuwait 79.2% compare
  3. 33 Poland 78.3% compare
  4. 34 Equatorial Guinea 78.2% compare
  5. 35 Barbados 78.0% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Iran

All data for Iran →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Iran?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Iran was 78.4% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Iran?
The highest recorded value was 81.0% in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Iran?
The lowest recorded value was 78.4% in 2016.
How does Iran rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Iran ranks 32nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Iran?
Over the last ten years it is down 3.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Iran data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Iran. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/iran-islamic-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/iran-islamic-rep/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Iran</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.